Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
The ITAT Indore addressed unexplained cash investment for property purchase post search operation. Addition without cross-examination was challenged. The Tribunal emphasized burden of proof on AO to allow cross-examination of third party whose documents led to addition. Failure to provide cross-examination opportunity led to deletion of alleged cash investment addition. Lack of additional evidence by Revenue and similarity to precedent case resulted in relief for the assessee. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee due to insufficient evidence and failure to adhere to principles of natural justice.
The ITAT Indore addressed unexplained cash investment for property purchase post search operation. Addition without cross-examination was challenged. The Tribunal emphasized burden of proof on AO to allow cross-examination of third party whose documents led to addition. Failure to provide cross-examination opportunity led to deletion of alleged cash investment addition. Lack of additional evidence by Revenue and similarity to precedent case resulted in relief for the assessee. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee due to insufficient evidence and failure to adhere to principles of natural justice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
