Depreciation and routine compliance expenses disallowance did not prove inaccurate particulars or misreporting; penalty sustained only on foreign trav...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3481 to 3500 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT Indore addressed unexplained cash investment for property purchase post search operation. Addition without cross-examination was challenged. The Tribunal emphasized burden of proof on AO to allow cross-examination of third party whose documents led to addition. Failure to provide cross-examination opportunity led to deletion of alleged cash investment addition. Lack of additional evidence by Revenue and similarity to precedent case resulted in relief for the assessee. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee due to insufficient evidence and failure to adhere to principles of natural justice.
The ITAT Indore addressed unexplained cash investment for property purchase post search operation. Addition without cross-examination was challenged. The Tribunal emphasized burden of proof on AO to allow cross-examination of third party whose documents led to addition. Failure to provide cross-examination opportunity led to deletion of alleged cash investment addition. Lack of additional evidence by Revenue and similarity to precedent case resulted in relief for the assessee. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee due to insufficient evidence and failure to adhere to principles of natural justice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
