Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Madras High Court reviewed a challenge to an adjudication order issued u/s 73 of the TN-GST Act. The court found that despite the petitioner submitting a detailed reply to the notice preceding the order, the order was passed without considering it. Consequently, the court held the order to be unsustainable and set it aside. The case was remitted back to the respondents to issue a fresh order within 8 weeks, following due process. The quashed order was to be treated as a corrigendum to the show cause notice. The Writ Petition was disposed of by the court.
The Madras High Court reviewed a challenge to an adjudication order issued u/s 73 of the TN-GST Act. The court found that despite the petitioner submitting a detailed reply to the notice preceding the order, the order was passed without considering it. Consequently, the court held the order to be unsustainable and set it aside. The case was remitted back to the respondents to issue a fresh order within 8 weeks, following due process. The quashed order was to be treated as a corrigendum to the show cause notice. The Writ Petition was disposed of by the court.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.