Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
The Madras High Court reviewed a challenge to an adjudication order issued u/s 73 of the TN-GST Act. The court found that despite the petitioner submitting a detailed reply to the notice preceding the order, the order was passed without considering it. Consequently, the court held the order to be unsustainable and set it aside. The case was remitted back to the respondents to issue a fresh order within 8 weeks, following due process. The quashed order was to be treated as a corrigendum to the show cause notice. The Writ Petition was disposed of by the court.
The Madras High Court reviewed a challenge to an adjudication order issued u/s 73 of the TN-GST Act. The court found that despite the petitioner submitting a detailed reply to the notice preceding the order, the order was passed without considering it. Consequently, the court held the order to be unsustainable and set it aside. The case was remitted back to the respondents to issue a fresh order within 8 weeks, following due process. The quashed order was to be treated as a corrigendum to the show cause notice. The Writ Petition was disposed of by the court.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.