Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Madras High Court addressed a case involving the levy of GST on ocean freight and the availability of Input Tax Credit (ITC) for inward supplies. The court found that the taxpayer failed to produce tax invoices for verification, rendering them ineligible for ITC. Additionally, three invoices for which ITC was claimed were not reflected in GSTR-2A, indicating non-payment of GST. The court dismissed the argument that credit was auto-populated in GSTR-2A. The court allowed the petition in part and dismissed it in part, citing relevant legal provisions such as u/s 122(2)(a) of the CGST Act and Section 16(2) of the CGST Act. The court also referenced a Supreme Court decision in a similar matter.
The Madras High Court addressed a case involving the levy of GST on ocean freight and the availability of Input Tax Credit (ITC) for inward supplies. The court found that the taxpayer failed to produce tax invoices for verification, rendering them ineligible for ITC. Additionally, three invoices for which ITC was claimed were not reflected in GSTR-2A, indicating non-payment of GST. The court dismissed the argument that credit was auto-populated in GSTR-2A. The court allowed the petition in part and dismissed it in part, citing relevant legal provisions such as u/s 122(2)(a) of the CGST Act and Section 16(2) of the CGST Act. The court also referenced a Supreme Court decision in a similar matter.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
