Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT Visakhapatnam dealt with a case involving penalty u/s. 271D for receiving cash in relation to the transfer of immovable property, which falls under section 269SS. The case was scrutinized under CASS to verify the source of cash deposits. Section 269SS prohibits receiving cash for immovable property transfers to curb black money. However, since the cash received was deposited into the bank account and capital gains were declared, it was deemed genuine. The explanation provided by the assessee constituted a "reasonable cause" u/s 273B, as the cash was accepted under unavoidable circumstances. The penalty imposed by the AO and upheld by the CIT(A) was deemed unsustainable in law, leading to the penalty being deleted. The assessee's appeal was allowed.
The ITAT Visakhapatnam dealt with a case involving penalty u/s. 271D for receiving cash in relation to the transfer of immovable property, which falls under section 269SS. The case was scrutinized under CASS to verify the source of cash deposits. Section 269SS prohibits receiving cash for immovable property transfers to curb black money. However, since the cash received was deposited into the bank account and capital gains were declared, it was deemed genuine. The explanation provided by the assessee constituted a "reasonable cause" u/s 273B, as the cash was accepted under unavoidable circumstances. The penalty imposed by the AO and upheld by the CIT(A) was deemed unsustainable in law, leading to the penalty being deleted. The assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.