Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT Chennai held that penalty u/s 114 Customs Act was not imposed on Respondents for smuggling undeclared cigarettes concealed with gypsum plaster. Penalty was imposed on Shri Anil Gupta, but dropped against Shri Jaffer. Tribunal found no evidence of false documents by Respondents, citing M/s. Artisan Welfare Society case. As no intentional false declaration was proven, penalty u/s 114 AA was unwarranted. Adjudicating authority's decision not to impose penalty upheld, department's appeal dismissed.
CESTAT Chennai held that penalty u/s 114 Customs Act was not imposed on Respondents for smuggling undeclared cigarettes concealed with gypsum plaster. Penalty was imposed on Shri Anil Gupta, but dropped against Shri Jaffer. Tribunal found no evidence of false documents by Respondents, citing M/s. Artisan Welfare Society case. As no intentional false declaration was proven, penalty u/s 114 AA was unwarranted. Adjudicating authority's decision not to impose penalty upheld, department's appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.