Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Delhi High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation alleging money laundering and tax evasion through undervalued share transfer. The Petitioner sought investigation into share sale valuation, but as the IT Department had examined it during Respondent No. 7's block assessment without adverse findings, no further directions were deemed necessary. The Court noted a previous petition by the same Petitioner against a common Respondent was dismissed as motivated, leading to the opinion that entertaining the present PIL did not serve the cause of justice or PIL objectives. The petition was dismissed.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation alleging money laundering and tax evasion through undervalued share transfer. The Petitioner sought investigation into share sale valuation, but as the IT Department had examined it during Respondent No. 7's block assessment without adverse findings, no further directions were deemed necessary. The Court noted a previous petition by the same Petitioner against a common Respondent was dismissed as motivated, leading to the opinion that entertaining the present PIL did not serve the cause of justice or PIL objectives. The petition was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
