Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The Delhi High Court set aside an order demanding payment including penalty u/s 73 of the CGST Act, 2017 due to the petitioner's lack of awareness and inability to respond to the proceedings, violating natural justice principles. The court found that the petitioner missed the notice uploaded in the "Additional Notices" tab on the portal. The impugned order was overturned, granting the petitioner an opportunity to respond to the Show Cause Notice and directing the respondent to reopen the portal for a response within four weeks. The petition was disposed of.
The Delhi High Court set aside an order demanding payment including penalty u/s 73 of the CGST Act, 2017 due to the petitioner's lack of awareness and inability to respond to the proceedings, violating natural justice principles. The court found that the petitioner missed the notice uploaded in the "Additional Notices" tab on the portal. The impugned order was overturned, granting the petitioner an opportunity to respond to the Show Cause Notice and directing the respondent to reopen the portal for a response within four weeks. The petition was disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.