Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
The Delhi High Court set aside an order demanding payment including penalty u/s 73 of the CGST Act, 2017 due to the petitioner's lack of awareness and inability to respond to the proceedings, violating natural justice principles. The court found that the petitioner missed the notice uploaded in the "Additional Notices" tab on the portal. The impugned order was overturned, granting the petitioner an opportunity to respond to the Show Cause Notice and directing the respondent to reopen the portal for a response within four weeks. The petition was disposed of.
The Delhi High Court set aside an order demanding payment including penalty u/s 73 of the CGST Act, 2017 due to the petitioner's lack of awareness and inability to respond to the proceedings, violating natural justice principles. The court found that the petitioner missed the notice uploaded in the "Additional Notices" tab on the portal. The impugned order was overturned, granting the petitioner an opportunity to respond to the Show Cause Notice and directing the respondent to reopen the portal for a response within four weeks. The petition was disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
