Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The Delhi High Court set aside an order demanding payment including penalty u/s 73 of the CGST Act, 2017 due to the petitioner's lack of awareness and inability to respond to the proceedings, violating natural justice principles. The court found that the petitioner missed the notice uploaded in the "Additional Notices" tab on the portal. The impugned order was overturned, granting the petitioner an opportunity to respond to the Show Cause Notice and directing the respondent to reopen the portal for a response within four weeks. The petition was disposed of.
The Delhi High Court set aside an order demanding payment including penalty u/s 73 of the CGST Act, 2017 due to the petitioner's lack of awareness and inability to respond to the proceedings, violating natural justice principles. The court found that the petitioner missed the notice uploaded in the "Additional Notices" tab on the portal. The impugned order was overturned, granting the petitioner an opportunity to respond to the Show Cause Notice and directing the respondent to reopen the portal for a response within four weeks. The petition was disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
