Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Delhi High Court set aside an order demanding payment including penalty u/s 73 of the CGST Act, 2017 due to the petitioner's lack of awareness and inability to respond to the proceedings, violating natural justice principles. The court found that the petitioner missed the notice uploaded in the "Additional Notices" tab on the portal. The impugned order was overturned, granting the petitioner an opportunity to respond to the Show Cause Notice and directing the respondent to reopen the portal for a response within four weeks. The petition was disposed of.
The Delhi High Court set aside an order demanding payment including penalty u/s 73 of the CGST Act, 2017 due to the petitioner's lack of awareness and inability to respond to the proceedings, violating natural justice principles. The court found that the petitioner missed the notice uploaded in the "Additional Notices" tab on the portal. The impugned order was overturned, granting the petitioner an opportunity to respond to the Show Cause Notice and directing the respondent to reopen the portal for a response within four weeks. The petition was disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
