Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The Delhi High Court addressed a case involving the retrospective cancellation of GST registration of the petitioner. The court found that the cancellation lacked proper reasons and violated principles of natural justice as the petitioner was not given an opportunity to object. The Show Cause Notice (SCN) and the order did not provide sufficient details for the cancellation, rendering them unsustainable. However, since the petitioner no longer wished to continue the business, the SCN was not quashed. The court emphasized that a taxpayer's registration should not be retrospectively cancelled merely for non-filing of returns, unless intended consequences are warranted. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
The Delhi High Court addressed a case involving the retrospective cancellation of GST registration of the petitioner. The court found that the cancellation lacked proper reasons and violated principles of natural justice as the petitioner was not given an opportunity to object. The Show Cause Notice (SCN) and the order did not provide sufficient details for the cancellation, rendering them unsustainable. However, since the petitioner no longer wished to continue the business, the SCN was not quashed. The court emphasized that a taxpayer's registration should not be retrospectively cancelled merely for non-filing of returns, unless intended consequences are warranted. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
