Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
In the ITAT Surat case, the appeal was delayed by 506 days. The issue was whether there was a "sufficient cause" for the delay, as claimed due to the receiver not opening the email with the order. The Chartered Accountant found the rejection while checking the ITBA portal. The Tribunal held that the delay was inexcusable as the assessee showed negligence and lack of diligence. The casual approach towards registration rejection did not constitute "sufficient cause" u/s 253(5) of the Act. The delay was not condoned, making it unnecessary to discuss the case's merits.
In the ITAT Surat case, the appeal was delayed by 506 days. The issue was whether there was a "sufficient cause" for the delay, as claimed due to the receiver not opening the email with the order. The Chartered Accountant found the rejection while checking the ITBA portal. The Tribunal held that the delay was inexcusable as the assessee showed negligence and lack of diligence. The casual approach towards registration rejection did not constitute "sufficient cause" u/s 253(5) of the Act. The delay was not condoned, making it unnecessary to discuss the case's merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
