Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4782
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 95633 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT Surat held that interest and remuneration received by the assessee as a partner of a firm are taxable u/s 28(v) of the Act. The assessee can claim deductions u/s 30 to 43D. Expenditure claimed u/s 37 must meet specific criteria: not covered by u/s 30-36, not capital, not personal, for business/profession, incurred in the year, not illegal. The car-related expenses claimed lacked evidence of business use. 50% allowed for business use, reducing disallowed amount to Rs. 2,71,322. The assessee's appeal partly allowed.
The ITAT Surat held that interest and remuneration received by the assessee as a partner of a firm are taxable u/s 28(v) of the Act. The assessee can claim deductions u/s 30 to 43D. Expenditure claimed u/s 37 must meet specific criteria: not covered by u/s 30-36, not capital, not personal, for business/profession, incurred in the year, not illegal. The car-related expenses claimed lacked evidence of business use. 50% allowed for business use, reducing disallowed amount to Rs. 2,71,322. The assessee's appeal partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.