Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT Surat held that interest and remuneration received by the assessee as a partner of a firm are taxable u/s 28(v) of the Act. The assessee can claim deductions u/s 30 to 43D. Expenditure claimed u/s 37 must meet specific criteria: not covered by u/s 30-36, not capital, not personal, for business/profession, incurred in the year, not illegal. The car-related expenses claimed lacked evidence of business use. 50% allowed for business use, reducing disallowed amount to Rs. 2,71,322. The assessee's appeal partly allowed.
The ITAT Surat held that interest and remuneration received by the assessee as a partner of a firm are taxable u/s 28(v) of the Act. The assessee can claim deductions u/s 30 to 43D. Expenditure claimed u/s 37 must meet specific criteria: not covered by u/s 30-36, not capital, not personal, for business/profession, incurred in the year, not illegal. The car-related expenses claimed lacked evidence of business use. 50% allowed for business use, reducing disallowed amount to Rs. 2,71,322. The assessee's appeal partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
