Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Page of 4788
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
421 to 440 of 95749 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT Pune ruled on interest income from land acquisition and...
Interest income from land acquisition not taxable u/s 28 - Additions of interest income derived from fixed deposits towards joint bank guarantee confirmed.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The ITAT Pune ruled on interest income from land acquisition and fixed deposits. Interest u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act is not taxable based on Bombay High Court precedent. Interest from joint bank guarantee not offered by sister is taxable in taxpayer's hands. The decision favored the taxpayer on land acquisition interest but ruled against on joint bank guarantee interest.
The ITAT Pune ruled on interest income from land acquisition and fixed deposits. Interest u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act is not taxable based on Bombay High Court precedent. Interest from joint bank guarantee not offered by sister is taxable in taxpayer's hands. The decision favored the taxpayer on land acquisition interest but ruled against on joint bank guarantee interest.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.