Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
581 to 600 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT Pune dealt with a case involving denial of standard deduction and Chapter VIA deductions u/s 80C. The appellant, an individual earning income under the head "Salaries," initially filed a return under the Old Tax Regime, which was later revised under the New Tax Regime. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision based on section 115BAC, which disallows certain deductions under the New Tax Regime. The tribunal emphasized that once a valid revised return is filed, the original return becomes irrelevant. Citing legal precedents, the tribunal held that under section 115BAC, opting for the New Tax Regime precludes entitlement to standard deduction and Chapter VIA deductions. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the correctness of the CPC's processing of the income tax return.
The ITAT Pune dealt with a case involving denial of standard deduction and Chapter VIA deductions u/s 80C. The appellant, an individual earning income under the head "Salaries," initially filed a return under the Old Tax Regime, which was later revised under the New Tax Regime. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision based on section 115BAC, which disallows certain deductions under the New Tax Regime. The tribunal emphasized that once a valid revised return is filed, the original return becomes irrelevant. Citing legal precedents, the tribunal held that under section 115BAC, opting for the New Tax Regime precludes entitlement to standard deduction and Chapter VIA deductions. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the correctness of the CPC's processing of the income tax return.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
