Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
581 to 600 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT Delhi addressed the issue of accrual of income and chargeability of income-tax on surcharge income offered by the assessee on a receipt basis. The assessee argued for taxation upon actual receipt of the surcharge, while the AO rejected this method. The tribunal held that the surcharge, being disputable and not mandatorily payable at the time of bill payment, was not an accrued receipt and thus not taxable as real income. The AO was directed to verify when the surcharge income was realized and offered for tax. Additionally, regarding u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D, the tribunal admitted additional evidence provided by the assessee and remanded the issue to the AO for re-examination. In a separate matter for Assessment Year 2014-15, it was held that investments were made from own funds, not borrowed funds, thus disallowance u/s 14A was not permissible. Appeals were allowed for statistical purposes.
The ITAT Delhi addressed the issue of accrual of income and chargeability of income-tax on surcharge income offered by the assessee on a receipt basis. The assessee argued for taxation upon actual receipt of the surcharge, while the AO rejected this method. The tribunal held that the surcharge, being disputable and not mandatorily payable at the time of bill payment, was not an accrued receipt and thus not taxable as real income. The AO was directed to verify when the surcharge income was realized and offered for tax. Additionally, regarding u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D, the tribunal admitted additional evidence provided by the assessee and remanded the issue to the AO for re-examination. In a separate matter for Assessment Year 2014-15, it was held that investments were made from own funds, not borrowed funds, thus disallowance u/s 14A was not permissible. Appeals were allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
