Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT Kolkata examined the validity of reassessment proceedings based on "reasons to believe" u/s 147. The AO's reasons lacked independent application of mind, being based on borrowed satisfaction without proper enquiry. The AO noted discrepancies in LTCG disclosure and re-assessed income u/s 147. However, the Tribunal found the AO's actions flawed, as the assessee had disclosed exempt income in Schedule-EI. The AO's lack of independent satisfaction led to quashing of the assessment, citing Meenakshi Overseas (P) Ltd. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.
The ITAT Kolkata examined the validity of reassessment proceedings based on "reasons to believe" u/s 147. The AO's reasons lacked independent application of mind, being based on borrowed satisfaction without proper enquiry. The AO noted discrepancies in LTCG disclosure and re-assessed income u/s 147. However, the Tribunal found the AO's actions flawed, as the assessee had disclosed exempt income in Schedule-EI. The AO's lack of independent satisfaction led to quashing of the assessment, citing Meenakshi Overseas (P) Ltd. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
