Proportionality in company penalty quantification requires aggravating and mitigating factors; mechanical multiplication of director liability is impe...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3261 to 3280 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT Kolkata examined the validity of reassessment proceedings based on "reasons to believe" u/s 147. The AO's reasons lacked independent application of mind, being based on borrowed satisfaction without proper enquiry. The AO noted discrepancies in LTCG disclosure and re-assessed income u/s 147. However, the Tribunal found the AO's actions flawed, as the assessee had disclosed exempt income in Schedule-EI. The AO's lack of independent satisfaction led to quashing of the assessment, citing Meenakshi Overseas (P) Ltd. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.
The ITAT Kolkata examined the validity of reassessment proceedings based on "reasons to believe" u/s 147. The AO's reasons lacked independent application of mind, being based on borrowed satisfaction without proper enquiry. The AO noted discrepancies in LTCG disclosure and re-assessed income u/s 147. However, the Tribunal found the AO's actions flawed, as the assessee had disclosed exempt income in Schedule-EI. The AO's lack of independent satisfaction led to quashing of the assessment, citing Meenakshi Overseas (P) Ltd. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
