Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
The ITAT Delhi held that the addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(c) for bonus shares received was not applicable as the overall wealth of a shareholder post or pre-bonus remains the same. The Tribunal emphasized that the provisions of section 56(2)(vii)(c) were not attracted in cases of bonus shares as there is no transfer of property to shareholders. The Tribunal referred to a similar case involving the wife of the assessee where the addition was made on identical facts, and held that the AO's invocation of the provision was incorrect. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal, stating that the money remains with the company in cases of bonus shares and no double benefit is derived by the assessee.
The ITAT Delhi held that the addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(c) for bonus shares received was not applicable as the overall wealth of a shareholder post or pre-bonus remains the same. The Tribunal emphasized that the provisions of section 56(2)(vii)(c) were not attracted in cases of bonus shares as there is no transfer of property to shareholders. The Tribunal referred to a similar case involving the wife of the assessee where the addition was made on identical facts, and held that the AO's invocation of the provision was incorrect. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal, stating that the money remains with the company in cases of bonus shares and no double benefit is derived by the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
