Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
The ITAT Delhi held that the addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(c) for bonus shares received was not applicable as the overall wealth of a shareholder post or pre-bonus remains the same. The Tribunal emphasized that the provisions of section 56(2)(vii)(c) were not attracted in cases of bonus shares as there is no transfer of property to shareholders. The Tribunal referred to a similar case involving the wife of the assessee where the addition was made on identical facts, and held that the AO's invocation of the provision was incorrect. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal, stating that the money remains with the company in cases of bonus shares and no double benefit is derived by the assessee.
The ITAT Delhi held that the addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(c) for bonus shares received was not applicable as the overall wealth of a shareholder post or pre-bonus remains the same. The Tribunal emphasized that the provisions of section 56(2)(vii)(c) were not attracted in cases of bonus shares as there is no transfer of property to shareholders. The Tribunal referred to a similar case involving the wife of the assessee where the addition was made on identical facts, and held that the AO's invocation of the provision was incorrect. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal, stating that the money remains with the company in cases of bonus shares and no double benefit is derived by the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
