International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
CESTAT AHMEDABAD held that services of civil construction are correctly classifiable under works contract service. Demand of service tax on construction services provided to government entities was rejected due to lack of proper notice specifying correct classification. Appellant's bona fide belief that the activity is not taxable was accepted. As services were provided to Government Agency, there was no intention to evade tax. Demand for extended period was barred by limitation. Adjudicating Authority's decision was set aside, and appeal was allowed.
CESTAT AHMEDABAD held that services of civil construction are correctly classifiable under works contract service. Demand of service tax on construction services provided to government entities was rejected due to lack of proper notice specifying correct classification. Appellant's bona fide belief that the activity is not taxable was accepted. As services were provided to Government Agency, there was no intention to evade tax. Demand for extended period was barred by limitation. Adjudicating Authority's decision was set aside, and appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
