Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1161 to 1180 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT Amritsar held that the reassessment order u/s 147 was invalid due to the absence of a statutory notice u/s 143(2). The non-issuance of the statutory notice u/s 143(2) was deemed an incurable defect, rendering the assessment proceedings legally flawed. Citing the judgments in Hotel Blue Moon and Laxman Das Khandelwal, the tribunal emphasized the mandatory nature of the notice. Referring to cases like Cebon India Ltd. and Punnu Synthetics Private Limited, the tribunal concluded that the assessment order was invalid without the requisite notice. The decision favored the assessee.
The ITAT Amritsar held that the reassessment order u/s 147 was invalid due to the absence of a statutory notice u/s 143(2). The non-issuance of the statutory notice u/s 143(2) was deemed an incurable defect, rendering the assessment proceedings legally flawed. Citing the judgments in Hotel Blue Moon and Laxman Das Khandelwal, the tribunal emphasized the mandatory nature of the notice. Referring to cases like Cebon India Ltd. and Punnu Synthetics Private Limited, the tribunal concluded that the assessment order was invalid without the requisite notice. The decision favored the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.