Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
CESTAT Bangalore upheld the revocation of license, forfeiture of security deposit, and penalty for smuggling gold as Diplomatic Cargo. The notice was not time-barred u/s 17(1) of CBLR 2018. Non-production of documents claim was dismissed as counsel had opportunity to submit based on later-received documents. Refusal of cross-examination was deemed delay tactic u/s SC Order. Violation of CBLR 2018 u/s 10(d), 10(n), and 10(e) by declaring false consignor details and aiding smuggling. Appellant's actions facilitated smuggling, breaching trust. Appeal dismissed, impugned order upheld.
CESTAT Bangalore upheld the revocation of license, forfeiture of security deposit, and penalty for smuggling gold as Diplomatic Cargo. The notice was not time-barred u/s 17(1) of CBLR 2018. Non-production of documents claim was dismissed as counsel had opportunity to submit based on later-received documents. Refusal of cross-examination was deemed delay tactic u/s SC Order. Violation of CBLR 2018 u/s 10(d), 10(n), and 10(e) by declaring false consignor details and aiding smuggling. Appellant's actions facilitated smuggling, breaching trust. Appeal dismissed, impugned order upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
