Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
The Supreme Court considered a case involving condonation of delay in filing an appeal. The appellants filed the appeal after SEBI had already appealed to the Court against the Securities Appellate Tribunal's order. The Court noted that the appellants succeeded on one issue but a remand order was issued on another issue to the Whole Time Member by SAT. The appellants stated that they had complied with the requirement to file submissions but no hearing took place before the Whole Time Member. Given the situation and the appeal filed by SEBI, the Court decided to condone the delay and issued notice in the matter.
The Supreme Court considered a case involving condonation of delay in filing an appeal. The appellants filed the appeal after SEBI had already appealed to the Court against the Securities Appellate Tribunal's order. The Court noted that the appellants succeeded on one issue but a remand order was issued on another issue to the Whole Time Member by SAT. The appellants stated that they had complied with the requirement to file submissions but no hearing took place before the Whole Time Member. Given the situation and the appeal filed by SEBI, the Court decided to condone the delay and issued notice in the matter.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
