Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Supreme Court considered a case involving condonation of delay in filing an appeal. The appellants filed the appeal after SEBI had already appealed to the Court against the Securities Appellate Tribunal's order. The Court noted that the appellants succeeded on one issue but a remand order was issued on another issue to the Whole Time Member by SAT. The appellants stated that they had complied with the requirement to file submissions but no hearing took place before the Whole Time Member. Given the situation and the appeal filed by SEBI, the Court decided to condone the delay and issued notice in the matter.
The Supreme Court considered a case involving condonation of delay in filing an appeal. The appellants filed the appeal after SEBI had already appealed to the Court against the Securities Appellate Tribunal's order. The Court noted that the appellants succeeded on one issue but a remand order was issued on another issue to the Whole Time Member by SAT. The appellants stated that they had complied with the requirement to file submissions but no hearing took place before the Whole Time Member. Given the situation and the appeal filed by SEBI, the Court decided to condone the delay and issued notice in the matter.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
