Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The case involved a dispute regarding the adjustment of an income tax refund with outstanding liability after the CIRP timeline had expired and a liquidation order was passed. The Appellate Tribunal held that the moratorium u/s 14 of IBC continues even after the CIRP period ends, and creditors cannot exercise set-off during this period. The Respondent was found liable to refund the amount set off against tax dues as it violated the moratorium. The Tribunal ordered the Respondent to refund the adjusted amount to the Corporate Debtor within two weeks. The judgment emphasized that set-off during CIRP is against IBC principles.
The case involved a dispute regarding the adjustment of an income tax refund with outstanding liability after the CIRP timeline had expired and a liquidation order was passed. The Appellate Tribunal held that the moratorium u/s 14 of IBC continues even after the CIRP period ends, and creditors cannot exercise set-off during this period. The Respondent was found liable to refund the amount set off against tax dues as it violated the moratorium. The Tribunal ordered the Respondent to refund the adjusted amount to the Corporate Debtor within two weeks. The judgment emphasized that set-off during CIRP is against IBC principles.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
