Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
The Punjab & Haryana High Court allowed the compounding of the offence u/s 138 N.I. Act between parties in a dishonour of cheque case. Citing precedent, the court held that compounding can be done during trial or by the High Court u/r Section 320(6) Cr.P.C. Settlement led to acquittal u/s 147 of NI Act and Section 320 Cr.P.C. The parties' voluntary settlement justified allowing compounding. The revision petition was allowed, with 15% of the cheque amount to be deposited with a specified center, leading to acquittal of the petitioner from the charge u/s 138 of NI Act.
The Punjab & Haryana High Court allowed the compounding of the offence u/s 138 N.I. Act between parties in a dishonour of cheque case. Citing precedent, the court held that compounding can be done during trial or by the High Court u/r Section 320(6) Cr.P.C. Settlement led to acquittal u/s 147 of NI Act and Section 320 Cr.P.C. The parties' voluntary settlement justified allowing compounding. The revision petition was allowed, with 15% of the cheque amount to be deposited with a specified center, leading to acquittal of the petitioner from the charge u/s 138 of NI Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
