Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The CESTAT ALLAHABAD held that the appeal abates u/s Rule 22 of Custom, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal Procedure Rules, 1982 due to the liquidation order by NCLT appointing an official liquidator for the appellant company. The official liquidator did not file an application for continuance of the appeal before the tribunal within five years of the NCLT order. As per Rule 22, the appeal stands abated.
The CESTAT ALLAHABAD held that the appeal abates u/s Rule 22 of Custom, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal Procedure Rules, 1982 due to the liquidation order by NCLT appointing an official liquidator for the appellant company. The official liquidator did not file an application for continuance of the appeal before the tribunal within five years of the NCLT order. As per Rule 22, the appeal stands abated.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
