Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Approved resolution plans extinguish unsubmitted pre-approval tax claims, preventing later recovery outside the insolvency process and preserving a cl...
Transfer pricing comparability requires functional alignment and permits working capital adjustment, while APA margins cannot govern non-covered years...
The Delhi High Court found a violation of natural justice principles in a case involving a cryptic order u/s 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The court held that the order failed to consider the petitioner's reply, which explained an error in tax credit details placement. The court set aside the order dated 05.12.2023, remitting the matter for a fresh speaking order by the proper officer. The petitioner will be granted a personal hearing. The petition was disposed of by way of remand.
The Delhi High Court found a violation of natural justice principles in a case involving a cryptic order u/s 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The court held that the order failed to consider the petitioner's reply, which explained an error in tax credit details placement. The court set aside the order dated 05.12.2023, remitting the matter for a fresh speaking order by the proper officer. The petitioner will be granted a personal hearing. The petition was disposed of by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.