Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
The Delhi High Court found a violation of natural justice principles in a case involving a cryptic order u/s 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The court held that the order failed to consider the petitioner's reply, which explained an error in tax credit details placement. The court set aside the order dated 05.12.2023, remitting the matter for a fresh speaking order by the proper officer. The petitioner will be granted a personal hearing. The petition was disposed of by way of remand.
The Delhi High Court found a violation of natural justice principles in a case involving a cryptic order u/s 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The court held that the order failed to consider the petitioner's reply, which explained an error in tax credit details placement. The court set aside the order dated 05.12.2023, remitting the matter for a fresh speaking order by the proper officer. The petitioner will be granted a personal hearing. The petition was disposed of by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.