Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The Jharkhand High Court granted permission for release of confiscated goods subject to a pre-deposit u/s 107 of the GST Act. The assessee was required to make a pre-deposit of 10% of the total value, which was not initially considered. Upon depositing Rs.2,71,000 in addition to penalties and fines, the confiscated goods would be released under specified conditions. The court directed that the respondents refrain from auctioning the goods and conveyance until the specified date. The petition was allowed by the court.
The Jharkhand High Court granted permission for release of confiscated goods subject to a pre-deposit u/s 107 of the GST Act. The assessee was required to make a pre-deposit of 10% of the total value, which was not initially considered. Upon depositing Rs.2,71,000 in addition to penalties and fines, the confiscated goods would be released under specified conditions. The court directed that the respondents refrain from auctioning the goods and conveyance until the specified date. The petition was allowed by the court.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
