Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
The Jharkhand High Court granted permission for release of confiscated goods subject to a pre-deposit u/s 107 of the GST Act. The assessee was required to make a pre-deposit of 10% of the total value, which was not initially considered. Upon depositing Rs.2,71,000 in addition to penalties and fines, the confiscated goods would be released under specified conditions. The court directed that the respondents refrain from auctioning the goods and conveyance until the specified date. The petition was allowed by the court.
The Jharkhand High Court granted permission for release of confiscated goods subject to a pre-deposit u/s 107 of the GST Act. The assessee was required to make a pre-deposit of 10% of the total value, which was not initially considered. Upon depositing Rs.2,71,000 in addition to penalties and fines, the confiscated goods would be released under specified conditions. The court directed that the respondents refrain from auctioning the goods and conveyance until the specified date. The petition was allowed by the court.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.