Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
The Jharkhand High Court granted permission for release of confiscated goods subject to a pre-deposit u/s 107 of the GST Act. The assessee was required to make a pre-deposit of 10% of the total value, which was not initially considered. Upon depositing Rs.2,71,000 in addition to penalties and fines, the confiscated goods would be released under specified conditions. The court directed that the respondents refrain from auctioning the goods and conveyance until the specified date. The petition was allowed by the court.
The Jharkhand High Court granted permission for release of confiscated goods subject to a pre-deposit u/s 107 of the GST Act. The assessee was required to make a pre-deposit of 10% of the total value, which was not initially considered. Upon depositing Rs.2,71,000 in addition to penalties and fines, the confiscated goods would be released under specified conditions. The court directed that the respondents refrain from auctioning the goods and conveyance until the specified date. The petition was allowed by the court.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.