Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Jharkhand High Court granted permission for release of confiscated goods subject to a pre-deposit u/s 107 of the GST Act. The assessee was required to make a pre-deposit of 10% of the total value, which was not initially considered. Upon depositing Rs.2,71,000 in addition to penalties and fines, the confiscated goods would be released under specified conditions. The court directed that the respondents refrain from auctioning the goods and conveyance until the specified date. The petition was allowed by the court.
The Jharkhand High Court granted permission for release of confiscated goods subject to a pre-deposit u/s 107 of the GST Act. The assessee was required to make a pre-deposit of 10% of the total value, which was not initially considered. Upon depositing Rs.2,71,000 in addition to penalties and fines, the confiscated goods would be released under specified conditions. The court directed that the respondents refrain from auctioning the goods and conveyance until the specified date. The petition was allowed by the court.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
