Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Telangana High Court addressed a case involving the recovery...
Refund: HC noted the argument that once an order is passed u/s 54, it can only be annulled in appeal or revision. No coercive action till next hearing.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The Telangana High Court addressed a case involving the recovery of a refund due to a misclassification of the supply of a solar power generating system. The petitioner argued that an order under u/s 54 of the CGST Act can only be annulled through an appeal u/s 107 or revision u/s 108. Citing a precedent, the court held that unless the Annexure-I certificate is cancelled following the procedure u/r 35E, invoking u/s 11A is impermissible. The court noted the submissions that the show cause notices as without jurisdiction and ordered no coercive action against the petitioner until the next hearing scheduled for 22.07.2024.
The Telangana High Court addressed a case involving the recovery of a refund due to a misclassification of the supply of a solar power generating system. The petitioner argued that an order under u/s 54 of the CGST Act can only be annulled through an appeal u/s 107 or revision u/s 108. Citing a precedent, the court held that unless the Annexure-I certificate is cancelled following the procedure u/r 35E, invoking u/s 11A is impermissible. The court noted the submissions that the show cause notices as without jurisdiction and ordered no coercive action against the petitioner until the next hearing scheduled for 22.07.2024.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.