Transfer-pricing benchmarking and capital-receipt principles sustained taxpayer relief, while unsupported property-advance write-offs remained disallo...
Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
The Delhi High Court considered a case involving condonation of delay in re-filing a review petition. The reasons provided for the delay included counsel's indisposition and procedural formalities due to the Petitioner being a Government Department. The Court found the reason of verbatim copy inadequate but accepted counsel's ill health as a valid ground. The Court noted that the cash seized was not stock in trade for the taxpaying business of optical lenses. Ultimately, the Court allowed the application for condonation of delay in re-filing the review petition, as there were no grounds to review the order dated 22.08.2023.
The Delhi High Court considered a case involving condonation of delay in re-filing a review petition. The reasons provided for the delay included counsel's indisposition and procedural formalities due to the Petitioner being a Government Department. The Court found the reason of verbatim copy inadequate but accepted counsel's ill health as a valid ground. The Court noted that the cash seized was not stock in trade for the taxpaying business of optical lenses. Ultimately, the Court allowed the application for condonation of delay in re-filing the review petition, as there were no grounds to review the order dated 22.08.2023.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4787
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
