Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
541 to 560 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Delhi High Court considered a case involving condonation of delay in re-filing a review petition. The reasons provided for the delay included counsel's indisposition and procedural formalities due to the Petitioner being a Government Department. The Court found the reason of verbatim copy inadequate but accepted counsel's ill health as a valid ground. The Court noted that the cash seized was not stock in trade for the taxpaying business of optical lenses. Ultimately, the Court allowed the application for condonation of delay in re-filing the review petition, as there were no grounds to review the order dated 22.08.2023.
The Delhi High Court considered a case involving condonation of delay in re-filing a review petition. The reasons provided for the delay included counsel's indisposition and procedural formalities due to the Petitioner being a Government Department. The Court found the reason of verbatim copy inadequate but accepted counsel's ill health as a valid ground. The Court noted that the cash seized was not stock in trade for the taxpaying business of optical lenses. Ultimately, the Court allowed the application for condonation of delay in re-filing the review petition, as there were no grounds to review the order dated 22.08.2023.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
