Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Data transmission equipment classification under CTSH 8517 62 remains distinct from residual classification, with exemption evidence requiring scrutin...
Page of 4788
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
721 to 740 of 95749 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling in Haryana dismissed an appeal due to non-payment of the required fee for filing. The appeal was against the order of the Authority for Advance Ruling regarding the classification of licensing services received by the applicant. The appellant failed to deposit the total fee of 20,000/- as mandated under the IGST Act, only paying 10,000/- as tax. As per legal provisions u/s 20 of the IGST Act and u/r 49 of the CGST and HGST Act, the appeal was deemed incomplete without the full fee and therefore not admitted. The appeal by M/s. Subway Systems India Private Limited was rejected, and the matter was disposed of accordingly.
The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling in Haryana dismissed an appeal due to non-payment of the required fee for filing. The appeal was against the order of the Authority for Advance Ruling regarding the classification of licensing services received by the applicant. The appellant failed to deposit the total fee of 20,000/- as mandated under the IGST Act, only paying 10,000/- as tax. As per legal provisions u/s 20 of the IGST Act and u/r 49 of the CGST and HGST Act, the appeal was deemed incomplete without the full fee and therefore not admitted. The appeal by M/s. Subway Systems India Private Limited was rejected, and the matter was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.