Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling in Haryana dismissed an appeal due to non-payment of the required fee for filing. The appeal was against the order of the Authority for Advance Ruling regarding the classification of licensing services received by the applicant. The appellant failed to deposit the total fee of 20,000/- as mandated under the IGST Act, only paying 10,000/- as tax. As per legal provisions u/s 20 of the IGST Act and u/r 49 of the CGST and HGST Act, the appeal was deemed incomplete without the full fee and therefore not admitted. The appeal by M/s. Subway Systems India Private Limited was rejected, and the matter was disposed of accordingly.
The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling in Haryana dismissed an appeal due to non-payment of the required fee for filing. The appeal was against the order of the Authority for Advance Ruling regarding the classification of licensing services received by the applicant. The appellant failed to deposit the total fee of 20,000/- as mandated under the IGST Act, only paying 10,000/- as tax. As per legal provisions u/s 20 of the IGST Act and u/r 49 of the CGST and HGST Act, the appeal was deemed incomplete without the full fee and therefore not admitted. The appeal by M/s. Subway Systems India Private Limited was rejected, and the matter was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4780
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
