Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
The Calcutta High Court allowed the condonation of a 1158-day delay in filing appeals, noting the appellants' diligence in pursuing the matter. The validity of a Chartered Accountant's Certificate was questioned, with the court finding that there was no evidence of deliberate production of a false document by the appellants. The court deemed the findings of the adjudicating and appellate authorities as perverse due to lack of proof of intentional wrongdoing. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration, emphasizing that the adjudicating authority should verify if the duty has been passed on and consider all relevant records, including any new certificate from the Chartered Accountant. The appeals were allowed with directions for a reevaluation.
The Calcutta High Court allowed the condonation of a 1158-day delay in filing appeals, noting the appellants' diligence in pursuing the matter. The validity of a Chartered Accountant's Certificate was questioned, with the court finding that there was no evidence of deliberate production of a false document by the appellants. The court deemed the findings of the adjudicating and appellate authorities as perverse due to lack of proof of intentional wrongdoing. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration, emphasizing that the adjudicating authority should verify if the duty has been passed on and consider all relevant records, including any new certificate from the Chartered Accountant. The appeals were allowed with directions for a reevaluation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
