Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The ITAT Delhi held that denial of Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) claim due to late filing of Form 67 after the due date of filing Income Tax Return (ITR) was not justified. Section 90 of the Act along with Article 25(2)(a) allows USA tax paid as a credit against Indian tax, limited to the proportion of Indian tax. Rule 128(9) mandates filing Form 67 by the due date of ITR filing u/s 139(1), recently amended to end of assessment year. The Rule does not specify denial of FTC if Form 67 is filed late or incorrectly and rectified later. Filing Form 67 is procedural, not mandatory. Violating procedural norms does not extinguish substantive right to claim FTC. The JAO is directed to allow FTC limited to proportion of Indian tax payable, ruling in favor of the assessee.
The ITAT Delhi held that denial of Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) claim due to late filing of Form 67 after the due date of filing Income Tax Return (ITR) was not justified. Section 90 of the Act along with Article 25(2)(a) allows USA tax paid as a credit against Indian tax, limited to the proportion of Indian tax. Rule 128(9) mandates filing Form 67 by the due date of ITR filing u/s 139(1), recently amended to end of assessment year. The Rule does not specify denial of FTC if Form 67 is filed late or incorrectly and rectified later. Filing Form 67 is procedural, not mandatory. Violating procedural norms does not extinguish substantive right to claim FTC. The JAO is directed to allow FTC limited to proportion of Indian tax payable, ruling in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4780
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
