Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
The ITAT Delhi held that denial of Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) claim due to late filing of Form 67 after the due date of filing Income Tax Return (ITR) was not justified. Section 90 of the Act along with Article 25(2)(a) allows USA tax paid as a credit against Indian tax, limited to the proportion of Indian tax. Rule 128(9) mandates filing Form 67 by the due date of ITR filing u/s 139(1), recently amended to end of assessment year. The Rule does not specify denial of FTC if Form 67 is filed late or incorrectly and rectified later. Filing Form 67 is procedural, not mandatory. Violating procedural norms does not extinguish substantive right to claim FTC. The JAO is directed to allow FTC limited to proportion of Indian tax payable, ruling in favor of the assessee.
The ITAT Delhi held that denial of Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) claim due to late filing of Form 67 after the due date of filing Income Tax Return (ITR) was not justified. Section 90 of the Act along with Article 25(2)(a) allows USA tax paid as a credit against Indian tax, limited to the proportion of Indian tax. Rule 128(9) mandates filing Form 67 by the due date of ITR filing u/s 139(1), recently amended to end of assessment year. The Rule does not specify denial of FTC if Form 67 is filed late or incorrectly and rectified later. Filing Form 67 is procedural, not mandatory. Violating procedural norms does not extinguish substantive right to claim FTC. The JAO is directed to allow FTC limited to proportion of Indian tax payable, ruling in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
