Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The ITAT Delhi, in a case involving penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for alleged concealment of income related to notional accruals/interest on a foreign bank account balance at HSBC Bank, Geneva, held that notional interest on the addition made in a previous assessment year could not be applied in subsequent years. Citing a Delhi High Court ruling, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the addition made by the AO and upheld by the CIT(A) for the assessment year in question, as the facts and legal principles remained consistent with the precedent.
The ITAT Delhi, in a case involving penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for alleged concealment of income related to notional accruals/interest on a foreign bank account balance at HSBC Bank, Geneva, held that notional interest on the addition made in a previous assessment year could not be applied in subsequent years. Citing a Delhi High Court ruling, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the addition made by the AO and upheld by the CIT(A) for the assessment year in question, as the facts and legal principles remained consistent with the precedent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.