Interactive flat panels meeting automatic data processing conditions are distinguished from monitors, while later classification clarifications apply ...
Statutory transfer formalities invalidated alleged share and property transfers, while retrospective record manipulation constituted oppression and mi...
Page of 4788
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
561 to 580 of 95749 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court considered the maintainability of a petition in light of the availability of an alternative statutory remedy. It was held that the availability of an alternative remedy does not always bar a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. The court distinguished between "entertainability" and "maintainability" of a writ petition. The non-issuance of notices electronically on the portal was discussed, emphasizing the statutory modes of service under Section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017. The court also addressed the non-uploading of certain forms, stating that compliance can be waived in certain situations. The issuance of notices and orders by different authorities was considered, with the court concluding that the petitioner failed to establish grounds for interference in the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed.
The High Court considered the maintainability of a petition in light of the availability of an alternative statutory remedy. It was held that the availability of an alternative remedy does not always bar a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. The court distinguished between "entertainability" and "maintainability" of a writ petition. The non-issuance of notices electronically on the portal was discussed, emphasizing the statutory modes of service under Section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017. The court also addressed the non-uploading of certain forms, stating that compliance can be waived in certain situations. The issuance of notices and orders by different authorities was considered, with the court concluding that the petitioner failed to establish grounds for interference in the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
