Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
The case involved the validity of an adjudication order u/s 73 of CGST Act, 2017/WBGST Act, 2017 with an appeal that was time-barred. The petitioner explained the delay due to medical reasons, supported by a medical certificate. The Appellate Authority did not question the certificate but dismissed the appeal, citing no provision to accept an appeal after the prescribed period. The High Court held that the medical reasons presented were valid, and the delay should have been condoned. The Court found the Authority's decision arbitrary and unjustifiable, thus setting aside the order and restoring the appeal. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.
The case involved the validity of an adjudication order u/s 73 of CGST Act, 2017/WBGST Act, 2017 with an appeal that was time-barred. The petitioner explained the delay due to medical reasons, supported by a medical certificate. The Appellate Authority did not question the certificate but dismissed the appeal, citing no provision to accept an appeal after the prescribed period. The High Court held that the medical reasons presented were valid, and the delay should have been condoned. The Court found the Authority's decision arbitrary and unjustifiable, thus setting aside the order and restoring the appeal. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
