Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
The case involved the validity of an adjudication order u/s 73 of CGST Act, 2017/WBGST Act, 2017 with an appeal that was time-barred. The petitioner explained the delay due to medical reasons, supported by a medical certificate. The Appellate Authority did not question the certificate but dismissed the appeal, citing no provision to accept an appeal after the prescribed period. The High Court held that the medical reasons presented were valid, and the delay should have been condoned. The Court found the Authority's decision arbitrary and unjustifiable, thus setting aside the order and restoring the appeal. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.
The case involved the validity of an adjudication order u/s 73 of CGST Act, 2017/WBGST Act, 2017 with an appeal that was time-barred. The petitioner explained the delay due to medical reasons, supported by a medical certificate. The Appellate Authority did not question the certificate but dismissed the appeal, citing no provision to accept an appeal after the prescribed period. The High Court held that the medical reasons presented were valid, and the delay should have been condoned. The Court found the Authority's decision arbitrary and unjustifiable, thus setting aside the order and restoring the appeal. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
