Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The case involved the validity of an adjudication order u/s 73 of CGST Act, 2017/WBGST Act, 2017 with an appeal that was time-barred. The petitioner explained the delay due to medical reasons, supported by a medical certificate. The Appellate Authority did not question the certificate but dismissed the appeal, citing no provision to accept an appeal after the prescribed period. The High Court held that the medical reasons presented were valid, and the delay should have been condoned. The Court found the Authority's decision arbitrary and unjustifiable, thus setting aside the order and restoring the appeal. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.
The case involved the validity of an adjudication order u/s 73 of CGST Act, 2017/WBGST Act, 2017 with an appeal that was time-barred. The petitioner explained the delay due to medical reasons, supported by a medical certificate. The Appellate Authority did not question the certificate but dismissed the appeal, citing no provision to accept an appeal after the prescribed period. The High Court held that the medical reasons presented were valid, and the delay should have been condoned. The Court found the Authority's decision arbitrary and unjustifiable, thus setting aside the order and restoring the appeal. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
